Tag Archives: google

Google’s Expanding Censorship Net Jeopardizes Internet Freedom

Share

bir-brother

What is Google?

Or more specifically, what is Google search?

Google search is essentially an algorithm. It’s a massive artificial brain that discovers and sorts and arranges the world’s information. And as an algorithm, it should know no moral, ethical or political prejudices. Even if something is unsavory, morally detestable, ethically questionable, the Google search algorithm ought to include it in its indices.

That Google search remain impartial and passive is vital to freedom of speech online. Indeed, as a company, Google has long championed internet freedom.

Unfortunately, Google’s ever widening censorship net threatens to throttle this very freedom.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

Breaking the MS Office Habit

Share

After more than 15 years, I’ve finally managed to untether myself from MS Office. I now use Google Docs for all my spreadsheets and documents. The transition hasn’t been smooth, but Google Docs is a worthy alternative and I’m happy that I’ve made the move.

The transition was borne out of frustration at Office’s slow speed and bloated feel. After losing more than a dozen files to an unfortunate and unwanted HDD format, I started my virtual life anew with a clean installation of Windows. I installed my usual software – iTunes, Notepad++, Tweetdeck, Skype, Chrome – but left out MS Office purposely because I wanted to see how long I could go without resorting to Word.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

Google Doesn’t Want me to Buy New Shoes

Share

Do this now: disable personalized results (add &pws=0 at the end of the search page) and do a quick search for ‘new shoes’.

Behold the sprawling failure that would make Matt Cutts curl up into a ball and weep:

new-shoes-google

Enhance!

new-shoes-google-2

Marketing and marathons never mixed better. When I search for new shoes, it is only but obvious that I would want to buy a completely unrelated product on marketing too.

Sigh.

Google, We Need to Talk

This result is the consequence of a new Google algorithm update that targets roughly 3% of searches. This follows a string of updates over the past few few months that seek to rid the SERPs of ‘webspam’, but inadvertently make the internet less fun, less democratic, and less useful.

Eliminating webspam is a noble idea. It’s hard to argue with a company that wants to remove crap from the internet.

But in the process, Google is essentially yielding power to established brands and authority sites.

The new update reiterates what Google has already said in the past: that branded websites are now being favored over smaller competitors. That unless you already have an established social media presence and thousands of well-written articles, you can’t touch the first page, let alone top it (barring a few anomalies like the one above).

In other words: the internet is becoming a lot like the real world. And that is a scary thought.

The internet was supposed to be the great equalizer. It was the platform a no-name startup could launch with a few hundred dollars, slap together a website, and pull rank in the SERPs and beat entrenched, established competitors.

Not anymore. This new update essentially says out loud that small guys aren’t welcome anymore. You need to be big to get anywhere near the top. But to get big, you need to be at the top – a Catch-22 situation if I ever saw one.

Part of the blame can be assigned to internet marketers and SEO experts who deemed it appropriate to pollute ever search result imaginable with regurgitated crap. But Google’s response in favoring brands is antithetical to the founding ethos of the internet itself.

We need to get back to an internet that welcomed the little guys with open arms. Forget relevancy, what’s at stake here is the very soul of the internet. And if the big guys win by default, the internet loses.

Share
Comments { 2 }

Reminder: This is Not Google-YouTube Circa 2006

Share

Pop into any discussion on the Facebook-Instagram deal and a single argument continues to bear its (ugly and dumb) head: that Facebook buying Instagram is equivalent to Google buying YouTube in 2006 for $1.65Bn.

Not.

The Facebook-Instagram deal isn’t the same as the Google-YouTube deal for four reasons:

  • Instagram isn’t the only player in the mobile photo sharing space, unlike YouTube’s absolute domination when it was purchased by Google in 2006. Path, Facebook, etc. are quite, if not equally, popular as well.
  • Instagram has a mere 30M users. It doesn’t even have a strong footprint in the Android marketplace, or heck, even a Windows Mobile app. Do people really believe that that the entire photo-sharing market is limited to iPhone users?
  • YouTube was at the frontier of an entirely new medium: video on the web. Pictures, though, have been shared on the internet for two decades now.
  • Perhaps most importantly, buying YouTube gave Google access to a huge content library that it could (and did) monetize. Instagram’s content library is quite worthless in this regard. You can’t show ads in pictures the same way you can with video; the revenue opportunities remain quite muted.
Share
Comments { 0 }

Larry Page: Screw Search, We’re Going Social

Share

Larry Page is in an unenviable position. The company he co-founded in 1998 is facing an uncertain future for the first time in its 14 year history. Web search is declining, and mobile cannot possibly match it in revenue opportunities. And ‘Facebook’ and ‘Social Media’ pack enough force to put a further dent in the company’s revenues. I’d start losing hair if I were him.

Page understands this. He is heralding a shift in the company’s culture after taking over from Schmidt – a culture change few in the Silicon Valley appreciate, but which may very well keep the company afloat in the next decade. And Page’s pandering to the Wall Street couldn’t possibly be more palpable in a long, long letter he wrote to investors today.

Read the letter over the weekend. It’s as good a document as any to predict Google’s growth in the next few years. The message is loud and clear: search is an accessory to social now.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

Calling Out Google’s Bullshit

Share

bullshitI’m morose today. I’ve had four cups of coffee since the morning, two muffins and a slice of cheesecake. I feel like a bloated beached whale.

Google’s bullshit and betrayal hasn’t helped my day either.

Early in the morning, I found myself searching for a new DSLR camera. Not that I’m interested in photography, but because toting around a DSLR camera gets you feminine attention. Trust me, I’ve tried.

I started my search on Google. Since I’ve never bought a DSLR camera before, I decided to be a little adventurous – I clicked on a Google shopping link. And I immediately regretted it.

I’d never encountered Google Shopping before. I don’t shop a lot online. In fact, I don’t shop a lot at all because I’m broke and have entered a Zen-like state of frugality. But my first visit to Google Shopping left me, let’s just say, “seething in anger”.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 15 }

Caught in the Act Again: Google Contractors ‘Sacked’ After Vandalizing OpenStreetMap

Share

darthvaderThe bad week for Google PR refuses to end. A few days after Google’s Mocality misadventure in Kenya, Google contractors have been found to be vandalizing OpenStreetMap (OSM) by removing vital information from the system and altering important data, TheVerge reports.

The Google contractors were based out of India and shared the same IP Address as the team that stole data from Mocality’s database. A Google spokesperson confirmed the vandalism and sacked the two contractors involved in the act. The spokesperson was very particular in emphasizing that the culprits were Google contractors and not Google employees.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

Google, You Scummy Bastard

Share

dr-evil Evil: that’s the only word you can use to describe Google’s recent misadventure in which it was found to be systematically accessing Mocality’s database – a Kenyan business directory – to sell business owners website packages under a false Google-Mocality joint venture, when none such venture existed. It is scummy, sinister, shameful, and can (will, should) turn into a major embarrassment for the company.

Context: Yesterday, Mocality’s CEO, Stefan Magdalinski, posted a revealing blog posted titled, “Google, What Were You Thinking”. The blog post accused Google of accessing Mocality’s painstakingly built database to extract contact information about businesses. This information was then used to sell businesses website packages as part of Google ‘Getting Kenyan Businesses Online’ initiative under a false Google-Mocality masthead. To substantiate these claims, Stefan produced IP-address records and most damningly, evidence from a sting operation which fed incorrect contact information that redirected to Mocality’s own call centers. The result, in Stefan’s own words:

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 1 }

Google Grounds Chrome for Violating Webmaster Guidelines

Share

Yesterday, I wrote about the really scummy thing Google Chrome did to boost its rankings: paying people to write posts about it, which is in direct violation of Google Webmaster Guidelines.

Google today responded by demoting the Chrome download site for 60 days.

I wasn’t quite sure if Google would take such a step. It could’ve easily brushed the issue aside with some PR mumble jumble. A 60 day ban is nearly not enough; I’ve seen lesser culprits fare far worse, but it is some action at least and is more than welcome.

Of course, as I’d predicted, Google didn’t quite own up to its sins. The blame was tossed around before it was settled firmly on Unruly Media (an ironic name in the context). According to Google’s email to Danny Sullivan of Search Engine Land:

Google never agreed to anything more than online ads. We have consistently avoided paid sponsorships, including paying bloggers to promote our products, because these kind of promotions are not transparent or in the best interests of users. We’re now looking at what changes we need to make to ensure that this never happens again.

Unruly Media, on the other hand, denied the link spam allegations altogether, saying that they were only buying advertising, not links, according to this interview with AllThingsD.

No one has addressed the issue of garbage content, however. All the posts linking to Chrome were filled with what can only be defined as utter crap. Google hasn’t owned up to it, neither has Unruly Media. I guess when you get caught with your pants down, explaining your choice of underwear becomes less of a priority.

Share
Comments { 0 }

Don’t Forget About Microsoft in the Apple vs. Google Fight

Share

boxing-microsoft-google-apple

Palm has been knocked cold, and from all indications, RIM has thrown in the towel too.

Now, there are just four players left in the ring: Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Nokia, battling it out for the future of computing.

The Daily Beast’s Daniel Lyons reduces this fight to just two competitors – Apple and Google – with scarce a mention of the giant from Redmond and the lumbering Finnish beast.

Perhaps Lyons is right. Apple and Google have proven to be far nimbler in the past decade, outmaneuvering and outinnovating the competitors. And while you could be skeptical two years ago, there is no doubt whatsoever that the future of computing is in mobiles and tablets. Apple and Google already have a large foothold in this space. It is not a stretch to imagine Google dominating these markets in the near future (not due to superior quality, but due to affordability of its products), with Apple coming in a healthy second (with massive profit margins, to add).

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }