Archive | Opinion RSS feed for this section

Google Doesn’t Want me to Buy New Shoes

Share

Do this now: disable personalized results (add &pws=0 at the end of the search page) and do a quick search for ‘new shoes’.

Behold the sprawling failure that would make Matt Cutts curl up into a ball and weep:

new-shoes-google

Enhance!

new-shoes-google-2

Marketing and marathons never mixed better. When I search for new shoes, it is only but obvious that I would want to buy a completely unrelated product on marketing too.

Sigh.

Google, We Need to Talk

This result is the consequence of a new Google algorithm update that targets roughly 3% of searches. This follows a string of updates over the past few few months that seek to rid the SERPs of ‘webspam’, but inadvertently make the internet less fun, less democratic, and less useful.

Eliminating webspam is a noble idea. It’s hard to argue with a company that wants to remove crap from the internet.

But in the process, Google is essentially yielding power to established brands and authority sites.

The new update reiterates what Google has already said in the past: that branded websites are now being favored over smaller competitors. That unless you already have an established social media presence and thousands of well-written articles, you can’t touch the first page, let alone top it (barring a few anomalies like the one above).

In other words: the internet is becoming a lot like the real world. And that is a scary thought.

The internet was supposed to be the great equalizer. It was the platform a no-name startup could launch with a few hundred dollars, slap together a website, and pull rank in the SERPs and beat entrenched, established competitors.

Not anymore. This new update essentially says out loud that small guys aren’t welcome anymore. You need to be big to get anywhere near the top. But to get big, you need to be at the top – a Catch-22 situation if I ever saw one.

Part of the blame can be assigned to internet marketers and SEO experts who deemed it appropriate to pollute ever search result imaginable with regurgitated crap. But Google’s response in favoring brands is antithetical to the founding ethos of the internet itself.

We need to get back to an internet that welcomed the little guys with open arms. Forget relevancy, what’s at stake here is the very soul of the internet. And if the big guys win by default, the internet loses.

Share
Comments { 2 }

Nick Bilton has a Brain-Fart

Share

Nick Bilton has a theory: that the Google+ and Facebook mobile apps suck because Google and Facebook are filled with pale, pimply nerds sans social lives who haven’t seen the sun in seven months, and who couldn’t possibly comprehend the outside world, where smartphones are whipped out on a regular basis for finding directions, lunch deals, and the occasional phone-off competition.

Nick Bilton has, what in polite company would be called a mild case of stupid. In less polite company, a brain fart.

 

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

The Future: AI, Robots, and Unemployment

Share

irobotAs a literary genre, I find science-fiction to be tired and lacking vitality. The generic conventions so constrict narrative freedom that most science-fiction books I’ve read seem replaceable and repetitive.

The same applies to most science-fiction movies.

Whenever I watch a sci-fi movie, especially ones populated with robots, I just can’t help but think: what the hell do all these humans actually do?

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 1 }

Coming Soon: Ads in Your Instagram Pics

Share

I’m sorry, but posting this was just a little too hard to resist :)

Your Instagram Pictures, before the Facebook Deal:

girl-large

After the Facebook-Instagram Deal:

 

girl-large-post-ads

Share
Comments { 0 }

Reminder: This is Not Google-YouTube Circa 2006

Share

Pop into any discussion on the Facebook-Instagram deal and a single argument continues to bear its (ugly and dumb) head: that Facebook buying Instagram is equivalent to Google buying YouTube in 2006 for $1.65Bn.

Not.

The Facebook-Instagram deal isn’t the same as the Google-YouTube deal for four reasons:

  • Instagram isn’t the only player in the mobile photo sharing space, unlike YouTube’s absolute domination when it was purchased by Google in 2006. Path, Facebook, etc. are quite, if not equally, popular as well.
  • Instagram has a mere 30M users. It doesn’t even have a strong footprint in the Android marketplace, or heck, even a Windows Mobile app. Do people really believe that that the entire photo-sharing market is limited to iPhone users?
  • YouTube was at the frontier of an entirely new medium: video on the web. Pictures, though, have been shared on the internet for two decades now.
  • Perhaps most importantly, buying YouTube gave Google access to a huge content library that it could (and did) monetize. Instagram’s content library is quite worthless in this regard. You can’t show ads in pictures the same way you can with video; the revenue opportunities remain quite muted.
Share
Comments { 0 }

The Boy Who Cried Bubble

Share

bubble-boyPardon me for spoiling your Instagram induced reverie, but I feel this needs to be said: we might be headed toward a bubble.

There. I said it. It had been gnawing at my heart and weighing on my skinny shoulders since the morning, when I, like the rest of you, learned of Instagram’s $1Bn sale to Facebook.

Perhaps it is jealousy. Perhaps it is rage. But in all likelihood, it is merely indignation at the audacity of a company that makes no money to have pocketed a billion dollars that has driven me to tear my hair out and scream “bubble! bubble!”  like a lunatic howling at the moon on a full-moon night.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

Larry Page: Screw Search, We’re Going Social

Share

Larry Page is in an unenviable position. The company he co-founded in 1998 is facing an uncertain future for the first time in its 14 year history. Web search is declining, and mobile cannot possibly match it in revenue opportunities. And ‘Facebook’ and ‘Social Media’ pack enough force to put a further dent in the company’s revenues. I’d start losing hair if I were him.

Page understands this. He is heralding a shift in the company’s culture after taking over from Schmidt – a culture change few in the Silicon Valley appreciate, but which may very well keep the company afloat in the next decade. And Page’s pandering to the Wall Street couldn’t possibly be more palpable in a long, long letter he wrote to investors today.

Read the letter over the weekend. It’s as good a document as any to predict Google’s growth in the next few years. The message is loud and clear: search is an accessory to social now.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 0 }

‘Working in Public is Weird’

Share

Josh Kaufman, author of Personal MBA, on working in public:

the past year and a half has been full of interviews, journalists, and requests from people I don’t know. Some of these interactions have been positive, and others have been negative. Regardless, the single best adjective I can think of to describe the experience is weird.

As a comfortable introvert who has chosen to tread the rather difficult terrain of working in a very public medium, I find Josh’s predicament deeply resonant. I enjoy working alone with nothing to impinge my privacy. I like to label myself a writer, and I’ve always held that writers must know and embrace solitude.

Gigantic ass chair, which actually is a representation of the solitude of the writer. Sucks to be that cyclist though.And yet, it isn’t lost on me that we are entering an age sans anonymity or privacy. The internet has turned us all into public figures, whether we like it or not. Everything we write, tweet, blog about leaves a trail that can eventually be traced back to us.

The internet has made marketers of us all. To remove oneself into a cocoon of solitude and anonymity would be to disconnect complete from all public mediums, the internet included.

Eventually, all of us – including introverts like myself – have to accept their fates and embrace the public nature of their lives. Many a dirge may be sung for anonymity and privacy online, but that won’t change the fact that today, we must all work in public, whether we like it or not.

And yes, it is very, very weird.

Share
Comments { 0 }

Young Programmer, Fresh Out of College, is Fired From Startup Job

Share

For being overenthusiastic with his ideas:

A couple of weeks later I was told ‘We don’t want you wasting to much time on your ideas, we have a committee for creating those letters’.

Arghh..

“We have a committee for creating those letters”

Nothing rattles my socialism scarred Indian soul more than hearing those words. In college, at odd jobs, even at family meetings, I’ve heard that dreaded word: committee - ultimate excuse for irresponsibility – sabotage every project, every initiative and every move towards progress. A committee implies a group of people who do little else than struggling to decide who should be included in said group of people.

If this word gets thrown about in your startup, run.

I don’t care about the context in which it is used. A startup is no place for a committee. Stab yourself in the heart before you ever work in a startup that is ruled by a committee and not an overbearing leader-figure.

Share
Comments { 0 }

Why I Pirate

Share

piratesI’m a pirate.

I never pay for games. I seldom pay for movies. I occasionally shell out a few bucks for music, but for the most part, I’m a pirate.

And I’m not ashamed of it.

I’m not a pirate on ideological grounds. I do not care if the RIAA or the MPAA deserves to financially raped thus. I don’t pirate because I am ideologically opposed to DRMs and selling art for money or giving it back to the Man.

I pirate because of economic reasons.

Let me illustrate.

Continue Reading →

Share
Comments { 1 }